The Florida Bar - Board Certified Badge
Martindale-Hubbell - AV Preeminent Badge
Super Lawyers - Michael B Cohen Badge

In the realm of criminal law, offenses are often categorized into two main types: blue collar crimes and white collar crimes. These classifications not only distinguish the nature of the offenses but also shed light on the socioeconomic backgrounds of the individuals involved. In Florida, a state known for its diverse demographics and bustling economy, understanding the difference between these two categories is essential.

Blue collar crimes typically refer to offenses committed by individuals from working-class backgrounds, often involving physical force or direct confrontation. These offenses can range from theft, burglary, and assault to drug-related crimes and vandalism. In Florida, with its vibrant urban centers and bustling communities, instances of blue collar crimes are unfortunately not uncommon. From Miami to Orlando and Tampa to Jacksonville, law enforcement agencies grapple with addressing these offenses while striving to maintain public safety.

On the other hand, white collar crimes are characterized by non-violent, financially motivated offenses typically committed by individuals in positions of trust or authority. These offenses include embezzlement, fraud, insider trading, money laundering, and identity theft. In Florida, with its thriving business sectors and a significant presence of financial institutions, white collar crimes pose a considerable challenge. Cities like Miami, with its bustling finance and real estate industries, often find themselves at the forefront of combating these sophisticated offenses.

In the state of Florida, tampering with evidence after committing a crime can lead to severe consequences, exacerbating the legal ramifications faced by the perpetrator. The act of tampering with evidence, whether it involves destroying, altering, or concealing it, is considered a serious offense that undermines the integrity of the judicial process and obstructs justice. Let’s delve into some of the possible repercussions of engaging in such actions within the Sunshine State.

First and foremost, tampering with evidence in Florida can result in criminal charges being brought against the individual responsible. Depending on the nature and severity of the crime involved, penalties for evidence tampering can range from misdemeanors to felonies. This could mean hefty fines, probation, or even significant jail time, further compounding the legal troubles stemming from the initial offense.

Moreover, tampering with evidence can significantly weaken the defendant’s credibility in court. Judges and juries tend to view such actions as indicative of guilt and a consciousness of wrongdoing. This can severely undermine the defendant’s case and may lead to harsher sentencing if convicted.

In recent years, Florida has seen a surge in cases related to the powerful synthetic opioid, fentanyl. Law enforcement agencies are cracking down on fentanyl-related offenses, leading to an increased number of individuals facing serious legal consequences. For those caught in the web of fentanyl-related charges, the assistance of a skilled criminal defense lawyer becomes paramount.

One of the primary challenges in defending against fentanyl-related charges is the severity of the penalties associated with these offenses. Florida has strict laws that classify fentanyl as a Schedule II controlled substance, with penalties ranging from hefty fines to lengthy prison sentences. A seasoned criminal defense lawyer is well-versed in these laws and can navigate the complexities of the legal system to build a strong defense strategy.

One key aspect a defense lawyer may explore is challenging the evidence presented by the prosecution. Fentanyl cases often involve complex forensic evidence, and an experienced attorney can scrutinize testing procedures and results to identify any potential flaws or inconsistencies. This could involve questioning the chain of custody of the evidence, challenging the reliability of testing methods, or raising doubts about the accuracy of the results.

Facing criminal charges is a daunting experience, and credit card fraud is no exception. In the state of Florida, being charged with credit card fraud triggers a complex legal process. Understanding the implications and potential consequences is crucial for protecting your rights and freedom.

The Legal Landscape:

Credit card fraud in Florida is a serious offense, encompassing various activities such as unauthorized card use, identity theft, and creating counterfeit cards. If charged, the legal journey typically begins with an arrest, followed by formal charges filed by the state. The severity of the charges depends on factors like the amount of money involved, the number of victims, and prior criminal history.

In June 2023, Mr. Cohen found himself in the midst of a high-stakes legal battle, defending his client, Dwight Lynch, against charges of Aggravated Battery with a firearm. This first-degree felony in Florida carries a daunting minimum mandatory 25-year sentence, putting Lynch’s freedom in jeopardy.

The case, State v Dwight Lynch, unfolded over four intense days in the courtroom. The heart of the matter revolved around the serious charge of Aggravated Battery, a crime that alleges intentional harm with a firearm. As the trial progressed, the stakes became increasingly clear – a guilty verdict would mean a lengthy prison sentence for Lynch.

One pivotal moment in the trial was Mr. Cohen’s cross-examination of the state’s crime scene investigator. Through a strategic line of questioning, Cohen demonstrated that the trajectory of the projectile, the centerpiece of the prosecution’s case, did not align with an intentional act of violence. This revelation lent substantial weight to the defense’s argument that Lynch had not intentionally shot the alleged victim.

Can a defendant receive a bond in a narcotics case and eventually receive a sentence well below his or her sentencing guideline range?

In United States v. Butler, Case number 21-CR-60085-RS-1, Mr. Cohen accomplished just that result.

Michael B. Cohen, Esq., has extensive experience in the field of federal criminal defense. If you are seeking a federal criminal defense attorney with the knowledge and expertise to assist you when facing federal charges, look no further than our law firm.

Florida is the third-leading state in the nation when it comes to the crime of identity theft. According to The Federal Trade Commission, Florida had 524 cases of identity theft committed in 2023, trailing only Maryland (534 cases) and Louisiana (574 cases) as the most prolific states for the commission of this crime.

If you need an attorney who is a specialist in the area of Federal Criminal Defense concerning this area of charged conduct, Michael B. Cohen is the expert you need to handle these matters. This reason is simple. Mr. Cohen’s vast experience in the area of Federal Criminal Defense. He is a former Assistant United States Attorney and has practiced in the area of state as well as federal criminal defense for over 47 years.

If you need help in a case and if you have been charged with a federal crime, Mr. Cohen is the Federal Criminal Defense Attorney and Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer you need to resolve your identity theft case or other federal criminal charges.

Self-defense is the basic idea that you can protect yourself when you’re in danger. Florida, like many states, has its own set of self-defense laws, including the “Stand Your Ground” law. Let’s delve into the intricacies of these laws and their implications for residents of the Sunshine State.

Self-Defense Laws in Florida:

Self-defense, in its simplest form, is the right to protect oneself from harm when faced with imminent danger. Florida’s self-defense laws are outlined in Florida Statute 776.012, commonly known as the “Stand Your Ground” law. This statute allows an individual to use deadly force if they believe it’s necessary to prevent death, great bodily harm, or the commission of a forcible felony against themselves or others. However, the key element is the individual’s reasonable belief of the threat.

In recent years, the debate surrounding firearm ownership and regulation has intensified, shedding light on the intricacies of gun-related laws. One such issue is the legality of purchasing firearms on behalf of another individual. Commonly referred to as a “straw purchase,” this practice has raised concerns within the legal community due to its potential implications for public safety.

A “straw purchase” occurs when an individual buys a firearm on behalf of another person who is either prohibited from owning firearms or seeks to bypass background checks and regulations. Such transactions are illegal under federal law, specifically under the Gun Control Act of 1968. This act prohibits any person from purchasing a firearm with the intent to transfer it to someone who is ineligible to possess firearms, such as convicted felons, minors, or individuals with a history of mental illness. Additionally, the act requires all firearm purchasers to complete a background check, regardless of whether they intend to keep the firearm or transfer it to someone else.

Engaging in a straw purchase can have severe legal consequences. Individuals caught violating these laws may face criminal charges, including fines and imprisonment. Both the purchaser and the person for whom the firearm was acquired could be subject to prosecution. Law enforcement agencies and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) actively investigate and prosecute cases involving straw purchases, as they contribute to the illegal flow of firearms into the hands of individuals who should not possess them.

Federal supervised release is a period of post-prison supervision designed to assist individuals in reintegrating into society while ensuring public safety. However, violating the conditions of supervised release can have serious repercussions. In Florida, as in other states, the consequences of such violations can be severe, leading to legal troubles and potential imprisonment. This blog explores the potential outcomes when one violates their federal supervised release in Florida.

Arrest and Detention:

Upon violating the terms of their supervised release, an individual may face arrest and subsequent detention. A warrant is typically issued, leading to the person’s apprehension and confinement in a detention facility until their violation hearing.

Contact Information